Titel:	Skin Toxicity of Selected Hair Cosmetic Ingredients: A Review Focusing on Hairdressers
Autor(en):	Symanzik, Cara Weinert, Patricia Babić, Željka Hallmann, Sarah Havmose, Martin Stibius Johansen, Jeanne Duus Kezic, Sanja Macan, Marija Macan, Jelena Strahwald, Julia Turk, Rajka van der Molen, Henk F. John, Swen Malte Uter, Wolfgang
ORCID des Autors:	https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-3710 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4090-6726 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3537-8463 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5335-9522 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2147-016X https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1063-4547 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8415-7571 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6269-5475 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5876-8923 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0719-2020 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5406-9458
Zusammenfassung:	The safety assessment of cosmetics considers the exposure of a ‘common consumer’, not the occupational exposure of hairdressers. This review aims to compile and appraise evidence regarding the skin toxicity of cysteamine hydrochloride (cysteamine HCl; CAS no. 156-57-0), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP; CAS no. 9003-39-8), PVP copolymers (CAS no. 28211-18-9), sodium laureth sulfate (SLES; CAS no. 9004-82-4), cocamide diethanolamine (cocamide DEA; CAS no. 68603-42-9), and cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB; CAS no. 61789-40-0). A total of 298 articles were identified, of which 70 were included. Meta-analysis revealed that hairdressers have a 1.7-fold increased risk of developing a contact allergy to CAPB compared to controls who are not hairdressers. Hairdressers might have a higher risk of acquiring quantum sensitization against cysteamine HCl compared to a consumer because of their job responsibilities. Regarding cocamide DEA, the irritant potential of this surfactant should not be overlooked. Original articles for PVP, PVP copolymers, and SLES are lacking. This systematic review indicates that the current standards do not effectively address the occupational risks associated with hairdressers’ usage of hair cosmetics. The considerable irritant and/or allergenic potential of substances used in hair cosmetics should prompt a reassessment of current risk assessment practices.
Bibliografische Angaben:	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 13, MDPI, 2022, 28
URL:	https://doi.org/10.48693/146 https://osnadocs.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/ds-202206237142
Schlagworte:	cysteamine hydrochloride; cocamide diethanolamine; cocamidopropyl betaine; cosmetics; hairdresser; hairdressing; hand eczema; polyvinylpyrrolidone; polyvinylpyrrolidone copolymers; sodium laureth sulfate
Erscheinungsdatum:	21-Jun-2022
Publikationstyp:	Einzelbeitrag in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift [article]
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:	FB08 - Hochschulschriften Open-Access-Publikationsfonds

Alle Ressourcen im Repositorium osnaDocs sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt. rightsstatements.org