Skin Toxicity of Selected Hair Cosmetic Ingredients: A Review Focusing on Hairdressers

Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen:
https://doi.org/10.48693/146
Open Access logo originally created by the Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Langanzeige der Metadaten
DC ElementWertSprache
dc.creatorSymanzik, Cara-
dc.creatorWeinert, Patricia-
dc.creatorBabić, Željka-
dc.creatorHallmann, Sarah-
dc.creatorHavmose, Martin Stibius-
dc.creatorJohansen, Jeanne Duus-
dc.creatorKezic, Sanja-
dc.creatorMacan, Marija-
dc.creatorMacan, Jelena-
dc.creatorStrahwald, Julia-
dc.creatorTurk, Rajka-
dc.creatorvan der Molen, Henk F.-
dc.creatorJohn, Swen Malte-
dc.creatorUter, Wolfgang-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-23T10:34:05Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-23T10:34:05Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-21-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 13, MDPI, 2022, 28ger
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.48693/146-
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnadocs.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/ds-202206237142-
dc.description.abstractThe safety assessment of cosmetics considers the exposure of a ‘common consumer’, not the occupational exposure of hairdressers. This review aims to compile and appraise evidence regarding the skin toxicity of cysteamine hydrochloride (cysteamine HCl; CAS no. 156-57-0), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP; CAS no. 9003-39-8), PVP copolymers (CAS no. 28211-18-9), sodium laureth sulfate (SLES; CAS no. 9004-82-4), cocamide diethanolamine (cocamide DEA; CAS no. 68603-42-9), and cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB; CAS no. 61789-40-0). A total of 298 articles were identified, of which 70 were included. Meta-analysis revealed that hairdressers have a 1.7-fold increased risk of developing a contact allergy to CAPB compared to controls who are not hairdressers. Hairdressers might have a higher risk of acquiring quantum sensitization against cysteamine HCl compared to a consumer because of their job responsibilities. Regarding cocamide DEA, the irritant potential of this surfactant should not be overlooked. Original articles for PVP, PVP copolymers, and SLES are lacking. This systematic review indicates that the current standards do not effectively address the occupational risks associated with hairdressers’ usage of hair cosmetics. The considerable irritant and/or allergenic potential of substances used in hair cosmetics should prompt a reassessment of current risk assessment practices.eng
dc.relationhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137588ger
dc.subjectcysteamine hydrochlorideeng
dc.subjectcocamide diethanolamineeng
dc.subjectcocamidopropyl betaineeng
dc.subjectcosmeticseng
dc.subjecthairdressereng
dc.subjecthairdressingeng
dc.subjecthand eczemaeng
dc.subjectpolyvinylpyrrolidoneeng
dc.subjectpolyvinylpyrrolidone copolymerseng
dc.subjectsodium laureth sulfateger
dc.subject.ddc610 - Medizin, Gesundheitger
dc.titleSkin Toxicity of Selected Hair Cosmetic Ingredients: A Review Focusing on Hairdresserseng
dc.typeEinzelbeitrag in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift [article]ger
orcid.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-3710-
orcid.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4090-6726-
orcid.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3537-8463-
orcid.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5335-9522-
orcid.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2147-016X-
orcid.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1063-4547-
orcid.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8415-7571-
orcid.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6269-5475-
orcid.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5876-8923-
orcid.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0719-2020-
orcid.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5406-9458-
dc.subject.bk44.11 - Präventivmedizinger
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph19137588-
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:FB08 - Hochschulschriften
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
ijerph-19-07588.pdf893,43 kBAdobe PDF
ijerph-19-07588.pdf
Miniaturbild
Öffnen/Anzeigen


Alle Ressourcen im Repositorium osnaDocs sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt. rightsstatements.org