A closer look at the sources of variability in scalar implicature derivation: a review

Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen:
https://doi.org/10.48693/498
Open Access logo originally created by the Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Langanzeige der Metadaten
DC ElementWertSprache
dc.creatorKhorsheed, Ahmed-
dc.creatorGotzner, Nicole-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-19T12:58:58Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-19T12:58:58Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-02-
dc.identifier.citationKhorsheed A and Gotzner N (2023): A closer look at the sources of variability in scalar implicature derivation: a review. Front. Commun. 8:1187970.ger
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.48693/498-
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnadocs.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/ds-2024021910734-
dc.description.abstractFor more than 20 years, studies in experimental pragmatics have provided invaluable insights into the cognitive processes involved in deriving scalar implicatures and achieving inferential comprehension. However, the reports have always contained a notable degree of variability that remained inadequately discussed in the literature. For instance, upon closer inspection of the experimental record, one can always find a group of individuals who tend to be largely pragmatic, overwhelmingly logical, or sometimes mixed not showing a clear preference. There also exist newly-devised paradigms that prompt a radically different type of response than other paradigms, and thus new evidence casting doubt on long-established findings in the field. More recent research on scalar diversity further suggests that differences in the semantic structure of scalar words can lead to differing rates of scalar implicatures and can modulate the time invested in pragmatic processing. Indeed, one can contend that the current empirical landscape on scalar implicatures can be characterized as having three primary sources of variability: inter-individual, methodological, and linguistic. What factor or factors are behind these patterns of variability, and how can we interpret them in light of a pragmatic theory? This paper has a 2-fold objective: one is to review the previous experimental record on scalar implicatures from variability-based lenses, and the other to discuss the factor(s) that could account for this observed variability in the literature. Avenues for future research are provided.eng
dc.relationhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1187970ger
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectscalar implicatureeng
dc.subjectsemanticseng
dc.subjectpragmaticseng
dc.subjectvariabilityeng
dc.subjecttesting paradigmseng
dc.subjectscaleseng
dc.subject.ddc004 - Informatikger
dc.subject.ddc150 - Psychologieger
dc.titleA closer look at the sources of variability in scalar implicature derivation: a revieweng
dc.typeRezension [Review]ger
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fcomm.2023.1187970-
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:FB08 - Hochschulschriften
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
Khorsheed_Gotzner_fcomm-08-1187970_2023.pdfReview-Article300,75 kBAdobe PDF
Khorsheed_Gotzner_fcomm-08-1187970_2023.pdf
Miniaturbild
Öffnen/Anzeigen


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons