Individual Differences in Emotion Regulation Abilities: Action Orientation’s Impact on Intuition, Negativity Bias in Depression, and Self-Infiltration

Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen:
https://osnadocs.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/urn:nbn:de:gbv:700-202001212531
Open Access logo originally created by the Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Langanzeige der Metadaten
DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.advisorProf. Dr. Julius Kuhlger
dc.creatorRadtke, Elise L.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-21T09:07:50Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-21T09:07:50Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-21T09:07:50Z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnadocs.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/urn:nbn:de:gbv:700-202001212531-
dc.description.abstractUsing action orientation after failure as a measure of individual differences in emotion regulation abilities (ERA), this thesis’ studies investigated the impact of ERA on cognition, behavior, and own versus imposed goals differentiation. The first study used cortisol as a physiological stress marker to replicate the link between ERA and the ability to make intuitive judgments under stress. High ERA were associated with increased performance in an intuition task under stress. In contrast, when feeling no stress, low ERA were associated with increased performance in an intuition task. The second study showed that ERA can compensate for depression-associated biased processing of negative stimuli. This effect was present even at mild to moderate depression levels. Replicating earlier findings, the third study showed that ERA are associated with an increased ability to distinguish self-chosen from imposed goals. Most importantly, the study identified activation in the right medial prefrontal cortex as a neural correlate of identifying self-chosen goals, and activation in the anterior cingulate cortex, as a correlate of falsely identifying imposed goals as self-chosen ones. Altogether, these studies show the necessity to consider individual differences in ERA in stress, clinical, and motivational research. The findings are discussed with respect to three theories that relate to motivation and personality from behavioral and neurobiological perspectives, namely, Personality Systems Interaction Theory, Predictive and Reactive Control Systems Theory, and Self-Determination Theory.eng
dc.subjectemotion regulationeng
dc.subjectpersonalityeng
dc.subjectaction orientationeng
dc.subjectruminationeng
dc.subjectcortisoleng
dc.subjectdepressioneng
dc.subjectStroopeng
dc.subjectself-infiltrationeng
dc.subject.ddc150 - Psychologieger
dc.titleIndividual Differences in Emotion Regulation Abilities: Action Orientation’s Impact on Intuition, Negativity Bias in Depression, and Self-Infiltrationeng
dc.typeDissertation oder Habilitation [doctoralThesis]-
thesis.locationOsnabrück-
thesis.institutionUniversität-
thesis.typeDissertation [thesis.doctoral]-
thesis.date2019-12-18-
dc.contributor.refereeProf. Dr. Roman Osinskyger
dc.subject.bk77.52 - Differentielle Psychologieger
dc.subject.bk77.05 - Experimentelle Psychologieger
dc.subject.bk77.45 - Motivationspsychologieger
dc.subject.bk77.46 - Emotionger
dc.subject.bk77.31 - Kognitionger
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:FB08 - E-Dissertationen

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
thesis_radtke.pdfPräsentationsformat747,31 kBAdobe PDF
thesis_radtke.pdf
Miniaturbild
Öffnen/Anzeigen


Alle Ressourcen im Repositorium osnaDocs sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt. rightsstatements.org