Free word association analysis of German laypeople’s perception of biodiversity and its loss

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Open Access logo originally created by the Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorEylering, Annike-
dc.creatorNeufeld, Kerstin-
dc.creatorKottmann, Felix-
dc.creatorHolt, Sebastian-
dc.creatorFiebelkorn, Florian-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology, 2023, 14(1112182), 1-17, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112182ger
dc.description.abstractDue to the dramatic biodiversity crisis, it is crucial to understand how people perceive biodiversity. Knowledge of how thoughts are organized around this concept can identify which ideas are best to focus on biodiversity conservation information campaigns. The primary aim of the present study was to identify social representations of the German public regarding the concept of biodiversity and its loss using a free word association test. Furthermore, unique association networks were analyzed. For this purpose, data collection was performed in September 2021 in Germany using an online questionnaire to assess participants’ associations with the prompt “biodiversity” (n = 131) and “biodiversity loss” (n = 130). Additionally, we used the social network software Gephi to create biodiversity (loss) association networks. The five most commonly mentioned associations for biodiversity were “animal,” “plant,” “nature,” “human,” and “flower.” For biodiversity loss, the five most commonly mentioned associations were “species extinction,” “climate change,” “plant,” “insect,” and “bee.” Neither “land use change” nor “invasive species,” as key drivers of biodiversity loss, were present in social representations of the German public. A difference was observed in the total number of mentioned associations between biodiversity and biodiversity loss. For both, the associations “plant” and “animal” were related. However, participants associated specific taxa only with animals, such as “insects” and “birds.” For plants, no specific taxa were named. Based on the network analysis, the most commonly mentioned word pairs for biodiversity and biodiversity loss were “plant – animal” and “species loss – climate change,” respectively. Based on our statistical network analysis, these associations were identified as the most central associations with the greatest influence in the network. Thus, they had the most connections and the function of predicting the flow in the network. In sum, the public’s multifaceted views on biodiversity and its loss, as well as the aforementioned central associations, hold great potential to be utilized more for the communication and education of biodiversity conservation. In addition, our findings contribute to the scientific community’s understanding of social representations and perceptions of biodiversity and its loss.eng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Germany*
dc.subjectsocial representation theoryeng
dc.subjectbiodiversity crisiseng
dc.subjectfree word association testeng
dc.subjectnetwork analysiseng
dc.subject.ddc570 - Biowissenschaften, Biologieger
dc.titleFree word association analysis of German laypeople’s perception of biodiversity and its losseng
dc.typeEinzelbeitrag in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift [Article]ger
Appears in Collections:FB05 - Hochschulschriften

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Frontiers_in_Psychology_14_2023_Eylering_et_al..pdf1,4 MBAdobe PDF

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons