Effects of Double-Anonymity on Pro- and Anti-Social Behavior: Experimental Evidence from a Lab in the Field
Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen:
https://doi.org/10.48693/3
https://doi.org/10.48693/3
Langanzeige der Metadaten
DC Element | Wert | Sprache |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Vorlaufer, Tobias | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-03T08:50:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-03T08:50:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-07-03 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 81, Elsevier, 2019, 216-225. | ger |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.48693/3 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://osnadocs.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/ds-202112035679 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper examines whether different degrees of subject-experimenter anonymity influence pro- and antisocial behavior in lab-in-the-field experiments. To do this, a Dictator Game (DG) and a Joy-of-Destruction Mini-Game (JoD) were conducted with 480 subjects in rural Namibia. In addition to a strict doubleanonymous treatment two single-anonymous treatments are introduced. One of them involves the disclosure of decisions directly to the experimenter. Thereby, it is possible to disentangle the effect of pure double-anonymity from the procedure of the decision-making. The presented results carry relevant implications for a methodologically sound implementation of lab-in-the-field experiments. Both in the DG and JoD, strict double-anonymous procedures do not produce significantly different behavior than under single-anonymity. Whether revealing decisions personally to the experimenter influences individual behavior cannot be consistently answered with the obtained results. The personal disclosure leads to significantly more pro-social and less anti-social behavior in one out of two treatment comparisons. From a conservative perspective, researchers are however advised to assure sufficient privacy for subjects from experimenters during the decision-making process. | eng |
dc.relation | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.07.001 | ger |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Germany | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/de/ | * |
dc.subject | Field experiments | eng |
dc.subject | dictator game | eng |
dc.subject | joy-of-destruction | eng |
dc.subject | double anonymity | eng |
dc.subject | experimenter-demand effect | eng |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 - Wirtschaft | ger |
dc.title | Effects of Double-Anonymity on Pro- and Anti-Social Behavior: Experimental Evidence from a Lab in the Field | eng |
dc.type | Einzelbeitrag in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift [article] | ger |
orcid.creator | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1586-5715 | - |
dc.subject.bk | 83.11 - Mikroökonomie | ger |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.socec.2019.07.001 | - |
Enthalten in den Sammlungen: | Publikationen |
Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Journal_of_Behavioral_and_Experimental_Economics_81_2019_Vorlaufer.pdf | Journal Article | 556,1 kB | Adobe PDF | Journal_of_Behavioral_and_Experimental_Economics_81_2019_Vorlaufer.pdf Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons